TY - CHAP
T1 - The family as mystery
T2 - why taking into account transcendence is needed in current family debates
AU - Schaafsma, Petruschka
PY - 2022/9/6
Y1 - 2022/9/6
N2 - The family is an “ideologically and politically charged” theme, especially when morality and religion are involved. This chapter joins Cristina L.H. Traina’s search for new approaches. Her proposal to characterize the family as responding to the call of our shared human precarity is examined for its ability to illuminate both the specificity of the family and its current controversial nature. To this end, a comparison is made with two alternative approaches. Jean-Philippe Pierron points to the symbolic nature of speaking about the family. Contrary to reified language, symbols allow expression of the ambiguous experiences that characterize family ties as both given and actively formed or ‘made.’ A second alternative, inspired by Gabriel Marcel, is to approach the family as mystery. This assumes not the naming of a core problem like the ambiguity between given and made, but the recognition of the unnameable but strong moral significance of the family. Marcel’s use of mystery, moreover, is spiritual; it points to a transcendent dimension. There are clear connections to this mystery character in everyday family life, which are elaborated in the last section. The comparison of the three approaches shows how attention to the transcendent dimension can stimulate moral debate beyond current impasses.
AB - The family is an “ideologically and politically charged” theme, especially when morality and religion are involved. This chapter joins Cristina L.H. Traina’s search for new approaches. Her proposal to characterize the family as responding to the call of our shared human precarity is examined for its ability to illuminate both the specificity of the family and its current controversial nature. To this end, a comparison is made with two alternative approaches. Jean-Philippe Pierron points to the symbolic nature of speaking about the family. Contrary to reified language, symbols allow expression of the ambiguous experiences that characterize family ties as both given and actively formed or ‘made.’ A second alternative, inspired by Gabriel Marcel, is to approach the family as mystery. This assumes not the naming of a core problem like the ambiguity between given and made, but the recognition of the unnameable but strong moral significance of the family. Marcel’s use of mystery, moreover, is spiritual; it points to a transcendent dimension. There are clear connections to this mystery character in everyday family life, which are elaborated in the last section. The comparison of the three approaches shows how attention to the transcendent dimension can stimulate moral debate beyond current impasses.
U2 - 10.4324/9781003305323
DO - 10.4324/9781003305323
M3 - Book chapter
T3 - Routledge studies in ethics and moral theory
SP - 210
EP - 217
BT - The transcendent character of the good
PB - Routledge
CY - New York
ER -