Abstract
Building on a plethora of conjectured emendations for IOϒΔAIAN, this article approaches the issue once again to test the viability of a quantitative tool and to establish the possibility of palaeographical confusion of IOϒΔAIAN with an alternative topo- or demonym. The article starts with an experiment using Greek topo- and demonyms derived from contemporary Christian, Jewish, and Classical sources to establish a palaeographical confusion score. Next the likeliness of the “closest” alternatives in the geographical arrangement of Acts 2:9–11 is explored. The article ends with an evaluation of the possible implications for the text in Acts 2:9 as well as a critical appraisal of the method for conjectural criticism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 378-391 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Open Theology |
Volume | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- table of nations, palaeographic confusion, conjectural criticism, spatial analysis